|Reconsideration request for http://mportlandrealestate.com/: Site violates Google's quality guidelines||JBern||5/17/12 10:42 AM|
I have read the FAQs and checked for similar issues:
My site's URL (web address) is: http://mportlandrealestate.com/
So about a month ago I started noticing some fluctuations in our site rankings... Upon some inspection of our back link profile I find that someone has built several hundred of links from several different domains that are basically iframes of our whole site, but on a warez/illegal download domain of some sort. Here's an example: http://www.downloadwarez.org/download-Real-estate-portland-indiana-full-crack-serial-keygen-rapidhare-by-PortlandHomesforSale-5701793.html
We ended up blocking the ability for other sites to iframe our site, thinking that would help, and things seemed fine after about a week.
Then Penguin hit.
Our site that used to rank for most of the main terms in regards to the "Portland Real Estate" market was slapped with some sort of penalty as it lost rankings for ALL the main terms. It still ranks for longtail stuff... but we lost a pretty large chunk of traffic and visitor registrations due to this.
So, I submitted a reconsideration request, with examples to these bad links, stating that they were not something that anyone on our team was responsible for (and we found a couple other sites that were apparently part of this "attack" with similar style links and thousands of porn related links too!) I included a link to that site as well (http://lakeoswegorealestatesearch.com) in my reconsideration request.
This is the response I get today:
I mean, I know the Googler's are probably inundated with these requests right now, but really? They basically told me to do what I originally did and provided no help whatsoever.
So, my question is... is it worth my time to try another reconsideration request? Or am I just going to keep getting these lame ass responses?
Any helpful insight would be greatly appreciated!
|Re: Reconsideration request for http://mportlandrealestate.com/: Site violates Google's quality guidelines||JerseyShop||6/29/12 1:59 AM|
Did you ever get an answer to this? I have a very similar problem.
|Re: Reconsideration request for http://mportlandrealestate.com/: Site violates Google's quality guidelines||I CAN SEE||6/30/12 2:16 PM|
I have a similar problem with my websites that were on the first page for terms "camere de supraveghere" . Of course the competition can create all those porn links to pull us down.
The websites that were on the first page are www.cameredesupraveghere.eu and www.cameredesupraveghere.net .
It is just absurd that we get penalties for something that anyone can do it ...
|Re: Reconsideration request for http://mportlandrealestate.com/: Site violates Google's quality guidelines||zihara||6/30/12 3:36 PM|
Good timing! I hope the Googlers who manually deal with these things aren't all in the US... we've been notified that the US offices of Google are going to be mostly vacant for the next week... Most of the duties we usually see being done in the US have been offloaded to folks in the EU and it's not like those folks aren't busy enough already with their own responsibilities. Going to be an interesting time...
|fathom||6/30/12 4:41 PM|
It is a knee-jerk reaction to kick webspam in front of Google and say "LOOK AT OUR WEBSPAM"!
PENGUIN is automatic... you didn't need to submit a reconsideration request. But now because you did you have a manual review.
Because Googlers (Google staff members) are not googlebot their individual thought process is often different than that of their robot friend.
With PENGUIN you can review you major swaths of phrases in Analytics and appreciate which anchored links should go.
That changes with a manual review... now anything that looks articial has to go.
I would start with your pay to post article networks.
Get rid of them and then comb your link profile for other versions of webspam.
|Saxor||7/7/12 1:06 AM|
You have recieved Googles standard RECONSIDERATION REQUEST FORM.
What a CROCK!
Us as well. (Twice). Even after removing all suspicious links
|fathom||7/7/12 1:23 AM|
"MY WHAT AN EXCELLENT TROLL YOU POSTED!"
Any chance of you might enlighten the OP how to fix that?