Google Product Forums

Re: Black Hat SEO Deformation abuse by cyber stalker to link full and rare name to obsenities


Lysis Apr 5, 2012 10:57 AM
Posted in group: Webmaster Central Help Forum

Categories: Chit-chat :

Ugh. Google isn't the police. Get a lawyer. Jeeez

On Thursday, April 5, 2012 11:39:11 AM UTC-4, CAN'T HANDLE MORE wrote:
Also Google search:  "SEO Deformation Abuse"  and you'll see the stories too.  

or "Black Hat SEO Deformation Abuse"

Search Engine Optimization is SEO

MY HORRIBLE STORY - I've been stalked, harassed and abuse by a Cyber Psychopathy, who is also a California Insurance Agent Broker in Orange County.  We found her father is an SEO blasting expert out of Florida.  Affiliated with the big SEO blasting companies.

MY FULL and personal name was put into Black Hat SEO.  I clear it up and re-blasted over and over.   My full and rare name tagged all over the world with obscenities, over 2,000 times I've clear it by contacting Hosting Company abuse depts. I cc: each eMail to google security & legal - to clear up the abuse.  I put Black Hat SEO abuse in the subject line.   I find their information through 'who is domain tools.'  Then used 'Google Removal Tools' to remove from searches once the name out of content.  This is ALSO happening to a college professor after not providing a student with the grade they felt they deserved.   Turned out my cyber stalker and who was my Orange County insurance agent back in 1997  - has a father who is an SEO blasting expert out of FL.  There are sites that blast out in Black HAT SEO.  

It's cost 100K for an attorney.  That's just a down payment.  You can tell the 'kid's' who post on these blogs and blurt out information they only see on TV and don't use their real experienced brains - what the real world is like.   Do you have 100K for just a down payment for an attorney. 

I obtained a TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER and taking the Insurance cyber psychopathy to trial.   We hired SEO experts to trace it all.   A professor who studies psychopaths was provided the series of harassment events which my stalker started back July 2010 (now its April 2012), with other tactics, and led up to SEO Deformation abuse.   He said "the psychopathy is clear here, ignore her, she wants attention."

A continued pattern of harassment, falls under Stalking, per CA.   If I don't get her, we have enough information for the Fed's to get her.   Google should be on it and looks like they are helping. 

What's shocking, is we believe this person (family) has tagged other people they just don't like and sent their names into Black Hat SEO abuse or SEO Deformation Abuse.  Just trashing their enemies names on Google searches with Black Hat SEO abuse. 

In my case, I simply didn't want to associate with her any more.  I saw her mental issues of extreme rage while beating up her cats and the dog she sits for a friend.  Kicks them etc. than tells them how much she loves them.  It was crazy, her rage from one extent to the other.   I just happen to know who the  stalker is by the continued and escalated harassment.   Then, found her father and SEO blasting expert.   Hosting company security depts were a big help when filing abuse tickets.   I would also contact the CEO of the hosting companies for help.

I looked up site owners around the world through "who is domain tools".   If site owners are not registered on 'who is' or eMail etc bounce, you can file and ICANN report and they will follow up.  Web site owner have to register accurate and all information.    If ICANN cannot find them, the site is terminated.

Google Security/Legal, Department of Justice, FBI are all notified and sent the links via eMail.   I connected to them on linkedin and been keeping them posted. 

Now the name only targeting Porn sites in SEO and blasting.   Can you believe this person is still operating as an insurance agent / broker in California !  She has all people private information of;  ss#, DL# and she's sick in the head.  Ted Bundy was her idol.    Report SEO abuse to:  le...@google.com and secu...@google.com.   Filed many complaints with IC3.gov.

I am not gay.  Everything, this cyber cyco relates me to is sexual.   She's a sick piece of poop.   People always get caught in the end.  If anything, everyone knows who she is.  She won't do this again. 

Deformation is a 2 year prison sentence !!!

SEO Abuse

SEO Deformation Abuse. 

California Insurance Agent Broker, Orange County


****************************

UNITED STATES FEDERAL LAWS

Your client continues to violate United States Federal Law H.R. 3402:

(1)   Under the Federal Crime, we are preparing to seek Federal legal action and this immediate relief: (a)    Cyber harassment, Cyber stalking, etc. in violation of the Women’s Violence Act, Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, H.R. 3402, titled "Preventing Cyber stalking" and numbered as § 113, §113(a)(3) provides that Section 223(a)(1)(C) applies to "any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet; Cyber-stalking and Cyber-harassment laws in violation of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(C) and § 223(h)(1)(B).  (b)   H.R. 3402 INCLUDES CYBER: Slander, Libel and Harassment.

FRIST;

Under Sec. 113.  FEDERAL “Preventing Cyberstalking”:  To strengthen stalking prosecution tools, this section amends the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C 223)(h)(1) to expand the definition of a telecommunications device to include any device or software that uses the Internet and possible Internet technologies such as voice over internet services.  This amendment will allow federal prosecutors more discretion in charging stalking cases that occur entirely over the internet.

 SECOND:

The Communications FEDERAL Act, at 47 U.S.C Section 223(a)(1)(C) has prohibited the making of telephone calls of the utilization of telecommunication devices without disclosing (one’s) IDENTITY to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person at the called number or who receives the communications.”

The FEDERAL Communication Act provides for fines and imprisonment of up to (2) two years for violations.

 

******************************************

Chinese Government laws”

China illegal information reporting center:  jiaoliu@china.org.cn

http://www.cnnic.net.cn/html/Dir/2007/06/04/4628.htm

7) Those spread pornography, obscenity, gambling, violence, homicide, terror or instigate crimes;
8) Those insult, libel against others and infringe other people's legal rights and interests; or
9) Other contents prohibited in laws, rules and administrative regulations.

 

***************************************

California

Last updated: January 11, 2012

Cal. Civil Code § 1708.7

SECTION 1. It is the intent of this act to clarify that electronic communications are included in the actions that can constitute the crimes of harassment and stalking. It is not the intent of the Legislature, by adoption of this act, to restrict in any way the types of conduct or actions that can constitute harassment or stalking.

SEC. 2. Section 1708.7 of the Civil Code is amended to read:
1708.7.

  1. A person is liable for the tort of stalking when the plaintiff proves all of the following elements of the tort:
    1. The defendant engaged in a pattern of conduct the intent of which was to follow, alarm, or harass the plaintiff. In order to establish this element, the plaintiff shall be required to support his or her allegations with independent corroborating evidence.
    2. As a result of that pattern of conduct, the plaintiff reasonably feared for his or her safety, or the safety of an immediate family member. For purposes of this paragraph, "immediate family" means a spouse, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any person who regularly resides, or, within the six months preceding any portion of the pattern of conduct, regularly resided, in the plaintiff's household.
    3. One of the following:
      1. The defendant, as a part of the pattern of conduct specified in paragraph (1), made a credible threat with the intent to place the plaintiff in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of an immediate family member and, on at least one occasion, the plaintiff clearly and definitively demanded that the defendant cease and abate his or her pattern of conduct and the defendant persisted in his or her pattern of conduct.
      2. The defendant violated a restraining order, including, but not limited to, ANY ORDER pursuant to Section 527.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, prohibiting any act described in subdivision (a).
  2. For the purposes of this section:
    1. "Pattern of conduct" means conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "pattern of conduct."
    2. "Credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that communicated by means of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and conduct, made with the intent and apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her immediate family.
    3. "Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, or pagers. "Electronic communication" has the same meaning as the term defined in Subsection 12 of Section 2510 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
    4. "Harass" means a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person which seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the person, and which serves no legitimate purpose. The course of conduct must be such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and must actually cause substantial emotional distress to the person.
  3. A person who commits the tort of stalking upon another is liable to that person for damages, including, but not limited to, general damages, special damages, and punitive damages pursuant to Section 3294.
  4. In an action pursuant to this section, the court may grant equitable relief, including, but not limited to, an injunction.
  5. The rights and remedies provided in this section are cumulative and in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law.
  6. This section shall not be construed to impair any constitutionally protected activity, including, but not limited to, speech, protest, and assembly.

SEC. 3. Section 422 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
422. Any person who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed one year, or by imprisonment in the state prison.

For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.

"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, or pagers. "Electronic communication" has the same meaning as the term defined in Subsection 12 of Section 2510 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

SEC. 4. Section 646.9 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
646.9.

  1. Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person and who makes a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, is guilty of the crime of stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by imprisonment in the state prison.
  2. Any person who violates subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order, injunction, or ANY OTHER COURT ORDER in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a) against the same party, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years.
  3. Every person who, having been convicted of a felony under this section, commits a second or subsequent violation of this section shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years.
  4. In addition to the penalties provided in this section, the sentencing court may order a person convicted of a felony under this section to register as a sex offender pursuant to subparagraph (E) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 290.
  5. For the purposes of this section, "harasses" means a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose. This course of conduct must be such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and must actually cause substantial emotional distress to the person.
  6. For purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
  7. For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and conduct made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family and made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to prosecution under this section.
  8. For purposes of this section, the term "Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, or pagers. "Electronic communication" has the same meaning as the term defined in Subsection 12 of Section 2510 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
  9. This section shall not apply to conduct that occurs during labor picketing.
  10. If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of a sentence is suspended, for any person convicted under this section, it shall be a condition of probation that the person participate in counseling, as designated by the court. However, the court, upon a showing of good cause, may find that the counseling requirement shall not be imposed.
  11. The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his or her immediate family.
  12. For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
  13. The court shall consider whether the defendant would benefit from treatment pursuant to Section 2684. If it is determined to be appropriate, the court shall recommend that the Department of Corrections make a certification as provided in Section 2684. Upon the certification, the defendant shall be evaluated and transferred to the appropriate hospital for treatment pursuant to Section 2684.

SEC. 5. Section 653m of the Penal Code is amended to read:
653m.

  1. Every person who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes contact by means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the person or property of the person addressed or any member of his or her family, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith.
  2. Every person who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith.
  3. Every person who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by both the fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following circumstances exist:
    1. There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
    2. The person makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
  4. Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed where the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the recipient.
  5. Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b), or (c) upon receiving the return call.
  6. If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the person participate in counseling.
  7. For purposes of this section the term "Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, or pagers. "Electronic communication" has the same meaning as the term defined in Subsection 12 of Section 2510 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

SEC. 6. This act shall become operative only if Assembly Bill 2351 is also enacted and becomes operative on or before January 1, 1999.

SEC. 7. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.

Notwithstanding Section 17580 of the Government Code, unless otherwise specified, the provisions of this act shall become operative on the same date that the act takes effect pursuant to the California Constitution.