| A list of BFM licenses - need to find out if they really own "Faithful Fathers - Canon by Pachelbel" | andandreyka | 6/30/12 3:16 AM | Hi! I know there's been a contyroversy over BFM actions. My very first video got a note that BFM administers "Faithful Fathers - Canon by Pachelbel". Can I find out if that is true and if I should acknowledge that; and allow them a share in possible |
| Re: A list of BFM licenses - need to find out if they really own "Faithful Fathers - Canon by Pachelbel" | The Lady From Uncle | 6/30/12 4:50 AM | It is not a question of whether or not the claimant has rights, but if you do. You need to consider if YOU have broadcast/synchronisation licence/permission to use the audio in question in the first place. Basically if you do not have express (writt |
| Re: A list of BFM licenses - need to find out if they really own "Faithful Fathers - Canon by Pachelbel" | Videodave2 | 6/30/12 8:02 AM | Like the Lady told you be sure that you have permission. That piece is so often used that finding a legal version is simple. I actually have two versions in different royalty free collections and I just checked and it is also available free creative |
| Re: A list of BFM licenses - need to find out if they really own "Faithful Fathers - Canon by Pachelbel" | andandreyka | 6/30/12 11:17 AM | Thanks for the advice. I'm going through documents to see if I have been allowed to use music by its owners for all purposes, or non-profit only. In the latter case - I have to acknowledge claimant's right if I plan to use ads alongside my video, rig |
| Re: A list of BFM licenses - need to find out if they really own "Faithful Fathers - Canon by Pachelbel" | The Lady From Uncle | 6/30/12 11:23 AM | You cannot monetise (run ads alongside your video) a claimed video, no. If the claim was correct, ie you DID use a non-royalty free recording of the piece of music, then you cannot do anything short of removing the video and re-uploading it with roya |
| Re: A list of BFM licenses - need to find out if they really own "Faithful Fathers - Canon by Pachelbel" | markimatang | 6/30/12 2:29 PM | “Because you certainly do not and therefore the claimant may well have.” Absolutely, but I suspect that Google’s removal of “misidentified content” as a reason to file a dispute has a more sinister reason. Pecunia non olet |