| Boolean + operator removed? Why? | InnateTech | 10/20/11 7:31 PM | It appears that the + operator, requiring a search term to be present in every result returned, has been removed. Why? This is going to seriously reduce Google's utility. |
| This message has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse. | |||
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | masinger | 10/21/11 5:24 AM | Type [+rent +Tauton] At the top of the results page, this appears: Showing results for rent Taunton The + operator has been replaced. To search for an exact word or phrase, use double quotation marks: "rent" "Taunton" |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Kelly F | 10/21/11 10:48 AM | Hi everyone, We've made the ways you can tell Google exactly what you want more consistent by expanding the functionality of the quotation marks operator. In addition to using this operator to search for an exact phrase, you can now add quotation ma |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | masinger | 10/21/11 11:02 AM | How does requiring us to type two characters instead of one in order to ensure that a key word appears in the search results simplify the search experience? For that matter, how do random and unannounced changes requiring us to change our documentati |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Colt45ws | 10/22/11 11:58 PM | I agree with masinger. Ive used the boolean "+" operator for as long as I can remember. Its ingrained in my search methodology. It aggravates me every time I make a search then have to turn around and adjust the search to current standards. |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Project Argelia | 10/23/11 2:09 PM | So... if i want to make a search like this: +better "search engine" -google +bing +altavista +infoseek Being "search engine" a search for an exact phrase in the page, +better +bing +altavista +infoseek a search for these terms in the page and -google |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | kkbfly | 10/23/11 6:43 PM | like Project Argelia, i am wondering the same thing. the changes seem to make searches more difficult not easier, and requires more key strokes http://overall.it's a terrible move to someone used to boolean. |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | LowLevel | 10/24/11 10:02 AM | The new way brokens a feature related to the search of single letters. Please note the difference of results between [intitle:"a b c"] and [intitle:"+a +b +c"]. Now it is no more possible to force single letters inside quotes. |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | MilesPrower | 10/24/11 12:02 PM | There better be an option to my account preferences coming if you do not plan to change this back to the basic fundamental rules and parsing of search queries based in boolean logic. |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | S-J-S | 10/24/11 12:21 PM | Do a search on Backwards +Compatibility and you might see how breaking it is Bad Thing. |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | BobEnt | 10/24/11 12:21 PM | Kelly, it sounds like you don't know what the + operator did. It didn't match an exact spelling of the word, it forced the search engine to only include results that contained that word. That functionality is now lost. We can't craft specific searche |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | masinger | 10/24/11 1:08 PM | Considering that Kelly F's corporate-speak was marked as an "answer" the moment it was posted, I'm guessing that there will be no further response. Probably sloppier search results = more ads. |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Yes MeSir | 10/24/11 2:15 PM | I've spent years training people in the power of '+' searching, they won't understand why you have done this. It looks like corporate arrogance to me. So are 'OR' and '-' vulnerable to the same treatment? |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Atribeistheanswer | 10/24/11 2:40 PM | Will you have something on the website to explain this? That means thousands or more computer books will need to be changed. |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | stilespj | 10/24/11 2:53 PM | I like the motto: "If it is not broke, don't fix it" In spite of the corporate Kellyspeak, this is a step backwards for Google seach, no boubt about it!!! p.s. Kelly's response is NOT the "Best Answer", no matter how many times it may be presen |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | knewt888 | 10/24/11 5:16 PM | When they went from doing an AND search to an OR search the + (or "", now) became necessary. If they'd left well-enough alone there would never have been a problem. The early appeal of google was that all terms were included in the search, leading |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | bmh_ca | 10/24/11 6:04 PM | Dear Google, Your change "remove + operator" has been considered, and it has been determined to be: unwanted. |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | matt.e | 10/24/11 6:13 PM | Most stupid change ever. Why is the worst answer marked as the best answer? Kelly is a Google employee, yet doesn't seem to understand how their product used to work before they broke it - the + and "" are NOT interchangeable. As everyone hates th |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Kelly F | 10/24/11 6:47 PM | Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I especially appreciate everyone's passion for search operators (if only every Google Search user were aware of these tools like you are...). One thing I'd like to add to my original post is that, as with any change |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | HinkcleyScott | 10/24/11 7:11 PM | Kelly, This looks like it breaks one of the ways I tend to do a fair number searches, where there are multiple terms of which I require at least one to be present. Example: when I want to find posts/sites/etc about the mounting post breaking on produ |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Brian Handscomb | 10/25/11 12:11 AM | And I love how Google's "Inside Search" actually TELLS you to use the + Seriously though... "how" "is" "this" +better +than +this This rate, next thing is instead of -minus they'll replace it with NOT("minus") |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | searchmeplus | 10/25/11 12:14 AM | If you're going to remove the plus, please update your help text everywhere. http://www.google.com/help/features.html still mentions it under Query Refinements Plus (+) Operator ... If a common word is essential to getting the results you want, y |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | melpadden | 10/25/11 12:42 AM | I would seriously urge Google to reconsider this before they annoy many more power users. I don't know if it's even a Power User trait to use the +operator, it's certainly one of the most often used characters in my search strings and a quick poll ar |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | PH1984 | 10/25/11 12:51 AM | How does forcing searches to be more general and returning thousands of extra (useless) choices benefit anybody? The only possible answer I can imagine, is that by forcing users to plod through dozens of extra pages while looking for one that looks |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | FJimenez | 10/25/11 1:22 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | rjchubb | 10/25/11 4:12 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | jessharpur | 10/25/11 4:30 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Dan Johnson | 10/25/11 5:09 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Spaced1999 | 10/25/11 5:23 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | new666uk | 10/25/11 5:36 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | kirbini | 10/25/11 5:49 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | smumford | 10/25/11 6:02 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | JohnALT2 | 10/25/11 6:29 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Mr Lang | 10/25/11 8:33 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Christopher Rose | 10/25/11 8:39 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Kelly F | 10/25/11 9:54 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | wfiske | 10/25/11 10:27 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | sdsalero | 10/25/11 11:10 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | efalk | 10/25/11 12:15 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | efalk | 10/25/11 12:15 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | plumegravated | 10/25/11 12:18 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | booleanstrings | 10/25/11 4:32 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | HinkcleyScott | 10/25/11 4:48 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | InnateTech | 10/25/11 5:16 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | InnateTech | 10/25/11 5:18 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | edward2020 | 10/25/11 5:39 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | clone2727 | 10/25/11 7:59 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | cellninja | 10/26/11 1:25 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | UKTW | 10/26/11 4:04 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | jbbryant | 10/26/11 4:56 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Meena Mid Roses | 10/26/11 6:52 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | masinger | 10/26/11 6:56 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | e_scott | 10/26/11 8:27 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | ferdGerbeler | 10/26/11 11:03 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | randomuser12345 | 10/26/11 11:13 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | PaulJones | 10/26/11 12:26 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | PatienceBu | 10/26/11 12:34 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | ds9boon | 10/26/11 1:08 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | edward2020 | 10/26/11 4:38 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | neel2312 | 10/26/11 4:52 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | T. C. | 10/26/11 7:23 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | aaronlawrence | 10/26/11 7:58 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Gregg DesElms | 10/26/11 8:21 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Chevanc | 10/26/11 9:09 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | UKTW | 10/27/11 1:41 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | WWWNooB | 10/27/11 3:50 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Apinamies | 10/27/11 4:33 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | WWWNooB | 10/27/11 5:20 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | UKTW | 10/27/11 5:26 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | WWWNooB | 10/27/11 6:33 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | aaronlawrence | 10/27/11 6:11 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | hucko | 10/27/11 6:32 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | GregSpy | 10/27/11 10:14 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | bluequoll | 10/28/11 4:07 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | patruns | 10/28/11 10:03 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | jehobu | 10/28/11 1:15 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Katnpp | 10/28/11 2:40 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | jessharpur | 10/29/11 2:32 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | RedCardinal | 10/29/11 6:16 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Entro | 10/29/11 8:29 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | tsteele93 | 10/30/11 2:30 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | aklesh3 | 10/30/11 3:15 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Kali-Strategist | 10/30/11 3:27 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Knocks | 10/30/11 3:29 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | CommunityString | 10/30/11 3:32 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | RourkeInsanity | 10/30/11 4:00 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | K. Little | 10/30/11 5:27 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | FullMeow | 10/30/11 5:28 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | grep--o | 10/30/11 5:30 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | grep--o | 10/30/11 5:31 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | jeroth87 | 10/30/11 6:08 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | magpac | 10/30/11 6:13 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Waraugh | 10/30/11 6:24 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Xparisky | 10/30/11 6:42 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | ttanner | 10/30/11 9:11 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | tim.a.elliott | 10/30/11 9:49 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | jessharpur | 10/30/11 10:37 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | jessharpur | 10/31/11 1:23 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | ClifDavis | 10/31/11 3:52 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | UKTW | 10/31/11 4:22 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | WWWNooB | 10/31/11 4:43 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | masinger | 10/31/11 4:46 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Chevanc | 10/31/11 7:56 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | jjf510 | 10/31/11 9:05 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | ClifDavis | 10/31/11 9:41 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | ClifDavis | 10/31/11 10:13 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | harddkyss | 10/31/11 12:06 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | jessharpur | 10/31/11 3:57 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Colt45ws | 10/31/11 4:19 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | RourkeInsanity | 10/31/11 5:39 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | masinger | 10/31/11 5:47 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | WWWNooB | 10/31/11 7:04 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Dan Johnson | 10/31/11 9:49 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | harddkyss | 11/1/11 2:08 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | steveecrane | 11/1/11 2:20 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | harddkyss | 11/1/11 2:26 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | aashay147 | 11/2/11 6:11 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Bouvrie | 11/2/11 6:58 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | plumegravated | 11/2/11 8:45 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | stevejaffe | 11/2/11 9:14 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | UKTW | 11/2/11 9:23 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | botogol | 11/2/11 9:55 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | aashay147 | 11/2/11 12:01 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Entro | 11/2/11 12:33 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Art Vigley | 11/2/11 12:38 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Art Vigley | 11/2/11 1:29 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | enigmatic_user | 11/2/11 11:00 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | javi g | 11/3/11 3:08 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | UKTW | 11/3/11 4:51 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Chevanc | 11/3/11 5:44 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | UKTW | 11/3/11 8:18 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | MicahDail | 11/3/11 8:55 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | paultr | 11/3/11 1:35 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | T. C. | 11/3/11 3:07 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | edward2020 | 11/3/11 3:20 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Dan Johnson | 11/4/11 9:50 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | jessharpur | 11/4/11 4:02 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | RedCardinal | 11/5/11 5:30 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Anthony Stuart | 11/5/11 7:50 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Krnntp | 11/5/11 7:36 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | paultr | 11/6/11 8:41 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | MortenSG | 11/6/11 10:29 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Chevanc | 11/6/11 12:11 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Auriam | 11/7/11 2:27 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Thomas P. | 11/7/11 5:12 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | plumegravated | 11/7/11 10:11 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | RedCardinal | 11/7/11 12:50 PM | |
| This message has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse. | |||
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | bluequoll | 11/7/11 2:49 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | UKTW | 11/7/11 3:04 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Thomas P. | 11/7/11 3:32 PM | |
| This message has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse. | |||
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Thomas P. | 11/7/11 3:43 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | plumegravated | 11/8/11 10:53 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | WWWNooB | 11/8/11 1:37 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Thomas P. | 11/8/11 6:13 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | UKTW | 11/9/11 2:09 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | enigmatic_user | 11/9/11 1:08 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Bilou | 11/9/11 1:19 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Kremmen | 11/13/11 10:51 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Mike-Parker | 11/15/11 4:38 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Mark Simpson | 11/15/11 7:37 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Kelly F | 11/15/11 9:19 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | masinger | 11/15/11 11:00 AM | |
| This message has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse. | |||
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Dan Johnson | 11/15/11 6:22 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | RedCardinal | 11/16/11 12:13 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Thomas P. | 11/16/11 7:15 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Thomas P. | 11/16/11 7:29 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | dpetra | 11/17/11 6:27 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | dpetra | 11/17/11 6:29 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | dpetra | 11/17/11 6:30 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | dpetra | 11/17/11 6:31 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | T. C. | 11/17/11 7:56 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | HinkcleyScott | 11/17/11 9:36 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | aashay147 | 11/17/11 10:59 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | syklist | 11/17/11 11:57 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | bardcan | 11/19/11 4:15 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Elwood Anderson | 11/25/11 2:55 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Bilou | 11/26/11 10:54 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | ds9boon | 11/27/11 10:07 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | ds9boon | 11/27/11 10:07 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | mixalisaspr | 11/28/11 3:17 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Thomas P. | 11/28/11 4:08 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Elwood Anderson | 11/28/11 8:53 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Brad Laue | 11/30/11 1:23 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | a37271 | 12/5/11 8:56 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Elwood Anderson | 12/5/11 10:06 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | rnelsonee | 12/7/11 5:57 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Thomas P. | 12/7/11 7:43 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Stephen3333321 | 12/15/11 1:42 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | boilerk | 12/15/11 2:41 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | mauri64 | 12/23/11 6:39 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Anttna | 12/26/11 6:22 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | WalterChadwick1967 | 12/27/11 12:43 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Noffo | 12/28/11 9:16 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | hexeditrix | 12/29/11 6:06 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | syklist | 1/4/12 3:43 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Johnffffff | 1/13/12 7:22 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Johnffffff | 1/13/12 8:09 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | TonyXavier | 1/13/12 3:07 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Sean F. | 3/13/12 6:04 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Clif Gazaway | 4/2/12 9:56 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | cryptique23 | 4/17/12 6:46 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | bhtkevin | 4/17/12 7:41 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | WhatAMess | 5/16/12 5:04 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | MikeyMike01 | 6/8/12 2:13 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | WTF+ | 6/9/12 8:17 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | StemCell | 6/16/12 4:13 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | tzofeolam | 6/17/12 8:51 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | evanwidloski | 6/27/12 7:57 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | evanwidloski | 6/27/12 8:01 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | tamhg | 7/14/12 3:16 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Stephanie A. | 7/19/12 5:54 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | HiredMind | 8/8/12 8:51 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | use duckduckgo | 8/28/12 4:03 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | GoogleIsUseless | 9/27/12 3:33 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Damien Wang | 11/6/12 6:43 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | GoogleIsUseless | 11/6/12 8:42 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Vermilion Heinlein | 11/21/12 12:43 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Jeremy Gross | 12/10/12 4:19 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | daveslc | 1/9/13 3:22 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | GoogleIsUseless | 1/9/13 9:23 PM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Arrow head | 1/18/13 5:41 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Vermilion Heinlein | 1/18/13 9:53 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Leo Smith III | 1/27/13 10:11 AM | <This message has been deleted.> |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | Leo Smith III | 1/27/13 11:22 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | GuerillaBeek | 2/8/13 8:53 AM | |
| Re: Boolean + operator removed? Why? | His Dudeness | 2/8/13 5:56 PM | |