| Control the sort order in sections | maccast | 12/18/11 11:39 AM | I noticed that while our section feeds are being updated in our editions that there doesn't seem to be any way to control the order. Because of this the Table of Contents page sometime looks odd because it will display an item as the 'Latest', but th |
| Re: Control the sort order in sections | SofiaF. | 1/10/12 3:47 PM | Hi Adam, Here's how you change the order of your feeds: 1. Go to Currents producer in your browser2. Click Sections3. Click Reorder Sections4. Drag and drop your sections up and down until they're in the order you want Hope this helps! CheersSofia |
| Re: Control the sort order in sections | Cassie Doll | 1/12/12 3:43 PM | Sorry Adam - the table of contents 'latest' selection had a bug that should now be fixed. If your toc continues to show content that isn't actually fresh, definitely let us know. Also, your feed should be sorted by article creation date - newest fir |
| Re: Control the sort order in sections | maccast | 1/12/12 4:57 PM | Thanks Cassie, it all looks good now. |
| Re: Control the sort order in sections | orcunmadran | 6/4/12 11:32 PM | Hii Cassie, Is there any way to sort articles alphabetically. I use producer for my educational content. So I wanted to order alphabetically by title. Best. |
| Re: Control the sort order in sections | Will Kiefer | 6/5/12 7:10 AM | Currently, there is no way to sort articles alphabetically. As a workaround, in custom article sections you can manually sort the articles (in Manage Articles->'Your Section Name'). I've entered the feature request in our system. Thanks! |
| Re: Control the sort order in sections | Nikhil Narayanan | 6/29/12 7:06 PM | Is there a way to order content from multiple sources according to their time stamp? Say, I fetch videos from Youtube and some content from my blog. I am trying to get everything together and then sorted according to time. As of now, it's Videos - so |
| Re: Control the sort order in sections | Cassie Doll | 7/1/12 5:16 PM | Not right now, but we will definitely consider this feature in the future. |