| What happened to the setting to change the ACL of a Lotus Domino mail file to read-only after migrating? | Tom Hillebrand | 9/13/11 10:37 AM | I am using GAMLN 3.1.2 and I do not see where I can have GAMLN mark a mail file as Read-only for the user when the migration is complete. This feature was in previous version of GAMLN. I'm not sure when it disappeared. This is very useful feature |
| Re: What happened to the setting to change the ACL of a Lotus Domino mail file to read-only after migrating? | Advisor Colin | 9/27/11 3:03 PM | This feature was deprecated in R3.0 https://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=161642 following feedback from customers. You can achieve the same result by adding code to the PostFinaliseUser routine that can be found in the Feeder |
| Re: What happened to the setting to change the ACL of a Lotus Domino mail file to read-only after migrating? | Tom Hillebrand | 9/29/11 5:09 AM | Thank you for the answer. Why would Google remove a feature? I can't imagine customer feedback brought this about. It must have been an oversight between versions/developers of the tool. |
| Re: What happened to the setting to change the ACL of a Lotus Domino mail file to read-only after migrating? | Richard | G-Workplace | 9/29/11 2:37 PM | The reader access to a Lotus Notes mail is normally a bad idea. Users can not forward messages, reply, or clean up there mail file after migration when they have reader access. Normally I offer after migration still te ability to Notes users to acces |
| Re: What happened to the setting to change the ACL of a Lotus Domino mail file to read-only after migrating? | Tom Hillebrand | 10/3/11 5:54 AM | I absolutely disagree with you Richard. The process I use to migrate with the GAMLN tool is...I wrote custom code into the tool, so upon completion of the migration GAMLN puts a forwarding address in the Domino Directory for the migrated user to the |
| Re: What happened to the setting to change the ACL of a Lotus Domino mail file to read-only after migrating? | Richard | G-Workplace | 10/6/11 9:54 AM | @Tom, Also agree with you. The options was nice. (if you understood it). My point was on minimizing support calls :) |