| Coverage for one site is 0.00%, and no clicks, but I see ads | faith eng | 6/30/12 6:03 AM | I have a site that prior to the panda change in April would get at least a few clicks per week. After my rankings dropped, clicks dropped to nothing, but then got better for little while. Then somebody clicked on 4 ads at once. This was about four we |
| Re: Coverage for one site is 0.00%, and no clicks, but I see ads | gddsmith | 6/30/12 10:46 AM | The 1st thing to check is if the ad code in your source code does in fact have your publisher ID in them if you're also not seeing any or very few impressions in Adsense. |
| Re: Coverage for one site is 0.00%, and no clicks, but I see ads | faith eng | 6/30/12 12:23 PM | Yes, my publisher ID is there in the code on each page. I just checked and made sure all the numbers were right. For the first time, instead of a medium or large rectangle or skyscraper, I'm using a small vertical ad with the text wrapped around the |
| Re: Coverage for one site is 0.00%, and no clicks, but I see ads | gddsmith | 6/30/12 12:51 PM | That may depend on what type of ad you are using. Is it text only, text & image/rich media. or image/rich media only? Since your coverage is 0% does that mean you're not seeing any impressions in Adsense either? Not sure why you went to a small ad i |
| Re: Coverage for one site is 0.00%, and no clicks, but I see ads | faith eng | 6/30/12 2:39 PM | I'm using text only, and yes, I do have ad impressions, but only a small number. I think it was right after I went to all small verticle ads that the coverage started saying 0.00%. And, yes again, these small ads were an experiment ...obviously an ex |
| Re: Coverage for one site is 0.00%, and no clicks, but I see ads | faith eng | 7/1/12 7:49 AM | Just want to post a quick update. Last night I changed all my ads from the small verticle ad to larger ads, and right away my coverage started going up. This morning it's at 100%, so I'm happy. It just baffles me, though, that google would even offer |